The Moral Authority of the People is Exactly What This Hour Requires
By Kelly John Walker
The American People are not powerless. What we lack is not rights, nor even conviction, but a disciplined means of exercising the authority we already possess. Our Constitution presumes an engaged citizenry capable of judging the conduct of its rulers. Natural Law affirms that no statute or office can erase that duty. Yet in modern practice, we have been trained to believe that our only recourse lies in distant institutions—elections, courts, agencies—that too often move slowly, speak vaguely, and answer to no one in particular.
And if you take an honest look at social media on any given day, you will find millions of Americans—and even members of our own government—voicing deep frustration at the absence of the justice and accountability they were promised. Arizona Representative Eli Crane captured that sentiment in an April post on X when he wrote that “most members of Congress aren’t here to solve problems. Most are here to perpetuate their own personal ambition.” And as Congressman Andy Biggs has put it even more bluntly, “Congress is not redeemable.” Coming from inside the institution itself, these are not partisan jabs—they are admissions that confirm what the People already know: the system is no longer correcting itself.
What makes this moment even more consequential is that the institution once expected to play this watchdog role—the so-called “Fourth Estate”—has largely abandoned it. There was a time when newspapers openly embraced this civic duty, even naming themselves Tribune in recognition of their role as a voice for the People standing between power and abuse—the Chicago Tribune, New York Tribune, and countless others. They understood that the press was meant to function as a modern tribune, exposing corruption and giving the People the information needed to judge their rulers. Today, the corporate media no longer stands between the People and power, but alongside it—managing narratives rather than interrogating authority. When the Tribune’s voice in the press falls silent, the duty does not vanish; it returns, by necessity, to the People themselves.
The People’s Tribune Council exists to correct that imbalance. It does not seek power over government, but to restore the moral authority of the People over those who govern. It does not command, coerce, or replace existing institutions. It intervenes—publicly, persistently, and with disciplined clarity—so that those who wield power are once again made answerable to the citizens from whom all just power flows.
This is not a novel experiment. It is the revival of a proven civic safeguard. For centuries, free peoples have found ways to interpose themselves between power and abuse. In ancient Rome, it took the form of the Tribunus Plebis, an office created by the People themselves that endured for nearly five centuries and, in practice, repeatedly checked patrician overreach, halted unjust acts, protected ordinary citizens, and forced the ruling class to reckon with popular judgment. The Tribune stood bodily between magistrate and citizen, empowered to say Intercedo—“I forbid”—and for generations that simple act restrained the machinery of power. In medieval England, this same principle emerged as the Magna Carta, when free men forced a king to submit to law and declared that justice would not be sold, denied, or delayed. And in America, it took its most explicit form in the Declaration of Independence, when the People themselves, in one united voice, laid out a formal bill of grievances against a tyrant and appealed to the “Supreme Judge of the world” for the rectitude of their intentions.
Each was, in its own age, an act of civic interposition—a collective “I forbid” spoken by free men against unaccountable power. The People’s Tribune Council stands in that same tradition today, adapted to a constitutional republic and a modern age, and founded precisely because this moment in our history now demands it.
Its effectiveness lies precisely in what it is not. It is not a government agency, bound by bureaucratic chains or political masters. It is not a self-funding nonprofit, driven by donors, branding, or institutional survival. It is not a partisan operation, serving factions or campaigns.
It is a civic body formed by experienced, self-supporting patriots whose sole allegiance is to the Republic and to the People who sustain it.
That independence is not a weakness. It is the very source of its authority, for it only answers to the People.
The People’s Tribune Council does not claim the coercive powers of the state. It commands no courts, no police, no prisons. But it does claim something older and higher: the moral authority of the People themselves. That authority does not arise from office or statute, but from the truth that all just power flows from the consent of the governed and is bounded by Natural Law. When the People speak in unity—naming injustice, exposing abuse, and refusing to legitimize it—they exercise a power no tyranny can long withstand.
The Council’s work begins with public intercession.
When a parent, whistleblower, journalist, or citizen is targeted, the first objective of abuse is always isolation. The People’s Tribune Council exists to break that isolation by stepping into the open and declaring that this case will not remain hidden and this person will not stand alone. It takes the facts, names the actors, publishes the record, and makes clear that what is happening is now a matter of public judgment. If necessary, the Tribune Council will do what tribunes have always done—stand visibly and physically between the persecuted and unjust authority, bearing witness and interposing the moral authority of the People in the face of tyranny itself.
In doing so, the Council also makes a further demand: that justice in this republic must not be reserved for the well-connected, the powerful, or the cases that happen to capture a fleeting headline. The quiet cases matter as much as the famous ones. The forgotten citizens deserve the same scrutiny and defense as those whose names make the headlines. The Council exists to ensure that unresolved wrongs are not simply waited out, buried in delay, or quietly ignored once public attention fades.
This alone changes the balance of power. Institutions accustomed to operating behind sealed files, redacted reports, and procedural fog are forced into the light. The People’s Tribune Council will not permit obfuscation, delay, or distraction to erode the justice and accountability owed to the People.
Intercession does not free the persecuted by decree—it exposes and challenges the thin pretexts and procedural schemes by which persecution is allowed to persist by keeping them in the light of scrutiny and constitutional limits.
From there, the Council moves to formal findings and dossiers.
One of the great strengths of modern institutional abuse is diffusion. Responsibility is scattered across offices, agencies, and jurisdictions until the petitioner is exhausted and gives up in frustration. The Council answers this with disciplined documentation: sworn testimony, timelines, evidence, and pattern analysis assembled into formal Findings of Abuse. By this means, responsibility is gathered back on every agency and officer, and no one is allowed to pass the buck.
The Council issues civic judgments, not court rulings—findings preserved in the public record that trace responsibility where institutions prefer ambiguity and deflection. Once issued, they follow officials into future appointments, hearings, and histories, publicly measuring their fidelity to the will of the People. These judgments cannot be quietly buried. They become part of the official record and legacy of individuals, agencies, and an era itself—shaping how they are judged and, in turn, determining the confidence and tenure they can command. Power that expects to operate with impunity begins to act differently when it knows it will be watched, named, and judged.
From there the Council ensures national amplification.
Power abusers thrive on obscurity and evasion. Cases die when attention drifts; bad actors know they can usually “wait it out” until their deeds fade into irrelevance. The People’s Tribune Council exists to deny them that refuge. Through media partners, networks, contact lists, interviews, and sustained public engagement, it keeps cases alive when the news cycle would rather move on.
The objective is not outrage for its own sake, but consequence—to make persecution socially, politically, and historically costly for those who believe they can operate with impunity. Tenacity, outspokenness, and a bulldog’s fidelity to truth—refusing to let it go—are powerful instruments of justice. The parable of the importuning widow reminds us that even an unjust judge can be moved by relentless appeal, not because he loves justice, but because he cannot escape a demand that never ceases to call for righteous judgment. In the same way, persistent civic witness—like water wearing away stone—compels those in power to reckon with what they would rather ignore. This is how the moral authority of the People reshapes behavior without wielding force.
At the same time, the Council engages in direct civic appeal to authority.
The People’s Tribune Council issues open letters to attorneys general, inspectors general, governors, members of Congress, and the President. It demands written explanations. It calls for investigations, dismissals, clemency, and reform. And when matters require private briefings or meetings under oath and under seal for legitimate security reasons, the Council will still insist on being present as a witness—so that even what cannot yet be spoken publicly is not hidden from the civic conscience of the People. These appeals are not whispered behind closed doors, but placed before the People themselves, so that authority is confronted not in secret, but in the light of public judgment.
Even when ignored, the Tribunes serve their purpose. Refusal becomes evidence, silence becomes record, and record becomes a mandate for accountability. No official likes to be confronted with a question that will not go away—one that resurfaces in letters, hearings, headlines, and history itself—until an answer is finally given, or the refusal to answer stands forever as its own indictment.
Yet the Council does not merely expose; it also builds protection.
Modern lawfare weaponizes isolation and division to set citizen against citizen. Solidarity and unity disarm this strategy. The People’s Tribune Council replaces division and isolation with coalition—linking the targeted with attorneys, journalists, advocates, donors, and fellow citizens willing to stand publicly beside them. But its strength lies even deeper: the Council is not divided along political, racial, or other contrived lines meant to fracture the People. It stands instead on the common ground of our shared humanity and on the Natural and Constitutional Rights that belong to all. In doing so, it reminds Americans that we are not adversaries to be conveniently categorized, but neighbors who can still recognize one another as fellow citizens. Courage grows when people realize they are not facing power alone, and that those standing with them do so not as partisans, but as People.
From that solidarity flows another, quieter but no less potent power: civic witness.
The Council shows up—in courtrooms, at press conferences, on the anniversaries of injustice, and wherever names are in danger of being forgotten. It stands where institutions would prefer absence, and speaks where power would prefer silence. In this manner, history will not be shaped only by verdicts and statutes drafted by the powerful, but by the witnesses who refuse to let truth be buried. In an age when narratives are too often written by compromised political brokers and curated for ulterior motives, the People’s Tribune Council insists that it must be the People themselves who keep the record, speak the names, and preserve the memory of what was done and why.
All of this converges in what may become the Council’s most distinctive act: the modern revival of the Tribune’s veto.
In ancient Rome, Tribunes could physically interpose themselves and declare Intercedo—“I forbid”—halting an unjust act by invoking the authority of the People. The People’s Tribune Council cannot bar a courthouse door, but it can issue a Civic Intercession Declaration—a public veto grounded in the moral authority of the People. In this sense, it stands in the same lineage as Runnymede in 1215 and Philadelphia in 1776—moments when free men said to power: “Thus far, and no further.”
When the Council declares “I forbid,” it means: We formally interpose the moral authority of the American People against this action. That authority ought to be recognized and honored by law. But as history reminds us, a Tribune must be willing to do what free men have always done when liberty was at stake—to put their own lives, their own security, and their own well-being on the line in defense of others—even, and especially when legislation or authority are weaponized to usurp Natural Law. The signers of the Declaration of Independence pledged to one another their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor. The People’s Tribune Council stands in that same spirit, understanding that true intercession is not merely spoken, but backed up by our willingness to lay our lives on the line for Truth and Justice.
In practice, this does five things.
First, it names the action as illegitimate—declaring plainly that a prosecution is abusive, an investigation retaliatory, a punishment is political, or a policy a violation of fundamental rights. In doing so, the Council strips away the false legitimacy imposed under “color of law,” where authority is substituted for legality.
Second, it calls the People to interpose—through petitions, mass statements, coordinated campaigns, and public demands. Not one voice, but many, saying together: this must not continue.
Third, it forces response—setting deadlines, demanding answers, and publishing refusals. Delay becomes confession, silence becomes evidence, and the “court of public opinion” passes judgment.
Fourth, it escalates—taking the matter directly to governors, Congress, and the President, demanding hearings, intervention, clemency, or investigation.
Finally, it enters the historical record—with names attached, facts preserved, and positions recorded—so that, for all posterity, Americans will know who stood where when it mattered most.
This is how a free people turn moral judgment into real consequence, but what does real delivery look like?
The Council may not command outcomes, but united civic authority can and does:
• Demand unjust charges be dropped
• Drive pardons and clemency
• Trigger investigations
• End careers built on abuse
• Protect future targets
• Restore reputations
• Ensure victims are heard and remembered
This is how power moves in a republic where the People exercise their God-granted oversight—not by decree, but by sustained moral pressure backed by unity and truth.
Why is this model more effective than the present status quo?
Because the status quo relies almost entirely on mechanisms that institutions themselves control, it should surprise no one that those same institutions rarely correct their own abuses. Elections spaced years apart, courts buried in procedure, agencies investigating agencies, and media (that too often takes sides rather than interrogating)—these are necessary parts of a republic, but they are not sufficient to bring accountability. Power that benefits from apathy, self-gain, corruption, and complexity has little incentive to reform itself.
The People’s Tribune Council does not replace the mechanisms of governance; it does what they increasingly fail to do by restoring the People’s active supervision of power. It upholds judgment of power rather than deference to it and it converts scattered outrage into disciplined civic action. The Council reclaims the enduring truth that no institution is sovereign over the People.
This is the moral authority of the People in action—and it is exactly what tyrannies fear most. Coercive power can be resisted, but the moral authority of an awakened and united People cannot be ignored.
The People’s Tribune Council will be only as strong as the People who stand behind it. It will not ask for funding, nor will it trade in the cult of personality that so often substitutes image for substance. It does not seek followers, but citizens; not applause, but participation. It does not promise easy victories, but tenacious pursuit of righteousness and justice. It does not claim perfection, but fidelity—to truth, to conscience, and to the Republic. It stands for service over self and sacrifice over spectacle, trusting that only such a posture can sustain the moral authority the People are called to exercise.
Americans want justice for the persecuted, accountability for the corrupt elite, and a republic worthy of being handed to their children. The call of this hour is not merely to vote and wait, but to stand as one people and entrust the People’s Tribune Council to listen, to exercise judgment, and intercede on our behalf.
Find out how we can reclaim the moral authority of the People and revive our Republic in a time of crisis. Visit ThePeoplesTribuneCouncil.com, sign our Letter to the President, and stay tuned as we build out the framework of this safeguard of liberty.
P.S. Don’t look for a “donate” button. You won’t find one. Use that money to take care of your family and strengthen your household.
Click the image below to read my new booklet, a revision of the key 1776 pamphlet that helped spark the American Revolution, Common Sense:
Common Sense for the 21st Century.
